Changing the picture of how rings interact and exist seem to remove many of the
carbuncles and a few of the warts on the mnp Model.
The charge structure of an electron is seen as figments making one long filament with a fixed curvature based on two sets of opposition. Figments tend to maintain proximity to other figments of like axis and direction but resist getting too close and so form filaments. A filament tends to maintain a fixed curvature because the tendency to align
axis is slightly forward looking and so maintains curvature and
the tendency to resist being too close prevents collapse. Closing the smallest feasible 3d sphere may lead
directly to quantization and a preferred size. When in a shell, the curvature of
the filament may be a little different due to influences of charge and mediators
(m's), so I am looking at pure "point" particles for now.
The long filament image also helps with movement and inertia, which was sketched
earlier but was dependent on "fixed angular change." I had wondered how rings
could maintain themselves when they appeared to need to make very fast angular
progress when in the "retrograde" portion of movement and to have varying angles
of "attack" and lateral movement and attraction. The drawings of rings with
plane parallel to travel should be seen as sections of "coiled filament"
rather than "ring" travel. I should not have seen the diagrams as elevations. If
the figments in a filament have a uniform angle of travel to the axis of the
filament, they will reinforce each others orientation and will move over the
surface of the oblate spheroid. Length compression of the spheroid will follow.
Changes and waves across the surface of the spheroid will propagate slower as
the lateral velocity increases and the longitudinal velocity decreases, in
keeping with the Lorentz transformation for measured time. Inertia comes from the angle of travel
for each filament to the axis of the filament and the tendency to maintain that
angle once achieved and uniform.
The filament model also obviates need for rings to attract each other to
maintain the integrity of the electron and allows shell changes while
maintaining the unified particle. This new image of a long "stiff" coil feels
more in keeping with quantum mechanics and more ready to parasitize that good
work.
Early calculations suggested a maximum change in one coil's rotation when on a
sphere of radius just above 1.8 times the coil radius, but refinements and
programmatic bug squishing have lost that local maximum, at least for one model
of coil curvature.
Question:
Is there a measured maximum wavelength for light (and hence a minimum energy and
mass for a photon)? A length and minimum mass would help scale the filaments by
provided mass/length and lead directly to a filament length for the unit charge.
From early numerical investigations of curved filaments over a sphere, it
looks like huge numbers of "coils" rather than "rings" will be involved. Such
scaling is not really needed now for early investigations but only in late stages of Model
development.
Prediction:
Have the Shapiro experiments or in fact any of the light ranging/transit of a large mass
experiments looked at occlusion? I suggest that if occlusion occurs when light
is traveling near a mass, that it is seen earlier than relativity predicts when
the occluding body is headed toward the mass and later than predicted if the
body is somehow leaving the mass. (Solar flares are more likely than spaceships,
I suppose) If the occluding body is moving transverse to the mass, it will need
to be further from the mass to achieve occlusion. Of course, this is based on
calculations of expected occlusion. The occluding object will be observed by
light traveling the same path as the occluded object. Asked another way, do
objects falling into a mass, when viewed from the side, appear to slow a little
compared to predictions as they near the mass?
The mnp Model
documentation has NOT yet been updated to replace rings with coils. The new
terms Axis (Alignment) and Travel (Alignment) rather than the deprecated Spin
and Proximity also remain to be folded in. Many of the basic concepts remain, including short
distance interaction, recruitment, fields as non-random
orientations in the "sea of random figments," rest mass as diminishing toward
zero with increasing velocity, and the universal reference frame.
Adventure Awaits
No comments:
Post a Comment