Neutrinos at the OPERA

The OPERA results of neutrinos traveling slightly faster than light have virtually all physicists rooting for the speed of light (and for the researchers to find a mistake.) The results affected the development of the mnp Model as well. Only with the attitude “surely it is wrong” could I create the image of how mnp rings move and have momentum without depending on the surrounding field. Time dilation as a byproduct of that movement was a surprising development.
With movement and momentum understood in the developing mnp Model, I could then ask the question, “Well, how could the neutrinos arrive slightly early?”

The explanation (if needed) is that the mnp Model sees neutrinos as not really quantized, but as dual rings of n's/negatives and p's/positives rotating opposite each other. The neutrino could be recruiting n's and p's at the front edge within the tiny range of influence that the basic entities have. The neutrino would be growing at the front, as a tube. If the experiment is showing the “front edge” which is equivalent to something like an electron neutrino with the bulk of the energy and balanced charge following, arriving at the speed of light, then no further explanation is needed.


If the massive neutrino appears “all at once” then the mnp Model explanation gets more convoluted and ugly. The mnp Model would need to consider “collapse” of the extended tube of the neutrino as a result of the figments of the front rings being turned or the front part of the tube being pulled apart. When the leading rings are no longer circular and balanced, they collapse. Traction (the attraction of figments of nearly the same spin perpendicular to the native speed of light travel) would pull in the figments around the tube. As they turn, Traction pulls the trailing figments in as well. Finding that the neutrino arrives over the course of 18 or more meters travel at c would lead to the simpler explanation.

We have not heard the final song from OPERA. I applaud the researchers' diligence and care, and look forward to hearing more.

mnp Model Introduced as a New View of Elementary Particles and Forces

What would it take to explain gravity and the other three forces? Can a model simpler than 34 elementary particles exist? Can the explanation be based on units that interact only over short distances?

Those questions led to the mnp Model, which suggests that three entities can account for gravity, light, static charge, magnetism, and the elementary particles. All entities travel at the speed of light. The three types differ by "spin" axis only. All entities attract others, repel others, attempt to match "spin", and attract strongly if "spin" matches over a tiny distance. Entities can travel through each other.

The mnp Model is descriptive and does not calculate quantities at the present time. See URL www.worldlyte.com/physics/mnp


Light is a photon (a line of oriented m-figments/mediators) which causes electric and magnetic fields to appear by reorienting the random entities in space. Those fields then affect the photon a little and following photons to a greater extend. The double slit experiment makes intuitive sense in the mnp Model. Static charge fields are caused by the charged body redirecting like charge entities away from the surface of charge, which then recruit m-figments to form a field parallel to the surface, which then directs incoming like charges to move more parallel to the surface and opposite charges more toward the surface.

Matter and mass are based on rings of charge entities, which when combined with a ring of the opposite charge rotating counter to the first, forms a neutrino. Electrons, positrons, and quark units or bulbs are seen as "spheres" formed of rings of one type of charge all rotating the same direction. The rings move when the entity's direction of travel is changed to include a lateral component. Time dilation (slowing of the rings) results from this redirection at velocities a fraction of the speed of light. It appears that length dilation is required for time dilation to match exactly the predictions of relativity (more slowing occurs if length dilation is not present).

Electrons are a surface of rings Standing waves at deBroglie wavelengths do not cause disappearance of the electron but adjustment to a stable orbital. The electron around a nucleus  need not be orbiting, but waves and perturbations will travel across the surface at approximately 2c/pi. Around a nucleus, an electron has mediators/m-figments flowing on the surface. Mediators/m-figments released through rings no longer parallel to the orbital surface when the orbital shrinks may organize themselves as a photon.

Quarks are seen as having structure, but with five models and counting, the exact form at "normal" conditions is not decided. Quark units and their connectors (and electrons in shells) recruit the third type of entity (mediators aka m-figments) to flow over the surface and act as glue at the connection between string and unit. At relativistic speed, the mnp Model predicts that more mediators/m-figments will be recruited over the surface of the quarks. The quark units, covered with mediators/m-figments do not act as strongly charged surfaces. The covering attracts other covered surfaces with compatible spin. The covering of the connecting strings probably recruits charge units to form rings which could lead to quark change (or repair).

Gravity is stochastic. All three basic entities act as gravitons. Since the entities behave differently and combine into structures differently, gravitational calculations at an astronomic scale become astronomically more complicated.


The author does not contend that the mnp Model is complete. With 4 forces and 4 or 5 degrees of freedom in how each of those forces interact, the computational work is formidable before the mnp Model claims to model the real universe.